SOTU? STFU
Democrats Had the Room and They Gave It Back
I suspected the State of the Union would be a feckless display of nothing from the opposition, and that's exactly what it was.
Democrats showed up to Donald Trump's stage, obeyed the stage directions, and called it resistance. Some sat silently. Some wore white. Some held up lapel pins. A few shouted into the noise and got swallowed by it. Al Green got ejected - again - holding a sign that said "Black People Aren't Apes," which is true and brave and dizzying in its banality of effect. Ilhan Omar shouted "You have killed Americans" while Trump told the country that Minnesota's Somali community "pillaged $19 billion" from taxpayers (a number that's off by at least $18 billion according to the government's own prosecutors). She was right. It didn't matter. The room is built to drown her out.
More than fifty Democrats boycotted. They went to the National Mall. They went to the Press Club. They scattered. And the empty seats got filled with guests, so the chamber looked full and unified behind the president anyway.
This is what happens when you treat a captured ritual like neutral ground instead of a coronation that cosplays as a report. The president always controls that room, the arc, the cameras, the guests, and the applause lines. You cannot resist inside someone else's production while following the production's rules. "Silent defiance" is a contradiction. You'd expect professional politicians to know that 10 fucking years into Trump's reign.
Tad Stoermer , the historian of resistance, made a point about the SOTU that I can't stop thinking about. He noted that, for Democrats to choose to have Abigail Spanberger deliver their official response from Colonial Williamsburg (a recent historical creation that only reinforces the founding mythology Trump has already claimed as his own) was assinine. The speech's literal theme was "America at 250." You can't out-America this man inside the myth. Stormer suggested the response should have been held in Minneapolis, to meet the moment where it actually lives. Or in Philadelphia with the mayor. Or in Munich, to name the rising authoritarianism plainly.
He's right, and it got me thinking about what genuine resistance would have looked like during the speech itself.
Walk out together, or don't bother.
Not a boycott. Not individual heckling. A coordinated departure keyed to a specific lie. Trump's Minnesota fraud claim was telegraphed for days. When he said it, the entire Democratic caucus could have stood, turned, and left to read a joint statement released that read something like: “The president just accused an entire ethnic community of theft. His agents killed two American citizens in their state. We will not be his audience for this.” You gotta force the camera to follow the empty half of the room. You gotta create the image instead of reacting inside his.
They didn't do this. They sat there and took it.
Hold the counter-event at the shuttered DHS building.
DHS has been shut down since February 14th. TSA workers aren't getting paid. Trump stood in the Capitol tonight and accused Democrats of "closing the agency responsible for protecting Americans from terrorists and murderers." The counter-event was on the National Mall, which is literally and symbolically empty space. It should have been in front of the shuttered department, surrounded by furloughed workers who actually protect airports and borders, forcing the press to show the contradiction rather than just describe it.
They didn't do this. They gave speeches to a rally crowd that was probably reading twitter coverage about the actual state of the union
Put the dead on camera before the speech, not the living in the gallery during it.
Democrats brought strong guests, I'll give em that. Epstein survivors (symbolically strong but weird in its own way, like why make these people face their abuser?), ICE-affected families from Minnesota. All strong picks from a juxtapositional standpoint.
But guests sit in the gallery. They're props in someone else's story.
Before the speech, Democrats should have held a press conference with the families of Keith Porter and Renee Good and Alex Pretti. So that when Trump later says "pillaged" on camera, the press already has the footage of the people his agents actually killed. Omar was right to shout "You have killed Americans." But you don't need to shout it from the floor if you've already put it on the record an hour earlier with the families standing next to you.
They didn't do this. The families weren't the story. Trump's scolding of them now is.
None of this is complicated. All of it requires one thing Democrats refuse to do: treat the ritual as captured and act accordingly. They keep showing up to the ceremony hoping the ceremony will protect them. It won't. The ceremony belongs to whoever controls the room, and that's Trump.
Real resistance is architectural. It requires advance coordination, shared risk, and a willingness to be accused of disrespecting the institution which, ya know, is the whole goddamn point.
You cannot resist authoritarianism while genuflecting to the rituals authoritarianism has already swallowed.
I knew this is what would happen.
I hate that I was right.


CP, your insights are in the bull’s-eye. I have been actively voting for 30 years, and this is so much more of the same- yet it feels like to the nth degree. The way they cling to decorum while Republicans treat them like garbage is really fucking hard to watch. They could’ve had a very calculated plan on how to come at this, narratively, from multiple angles. What we heard tonight is the speech of a man who is terrified of going to prison. He is doing anything and everything to divert attention, and the fact that there were Democrats in the room for the entire D-list award-winning performance is quite nauseating.
-center the families of murdered ppl at the hands if ICE
-center the survivors of Trump and Epstein (maybe outside the building, FFS!!)
The do nothing dems back at it again.